Debate over the Philippines
imperialism
Broadly, the extension of rule or influence by one government, nation, or society over another.
Evidence of the existence of empires dates back to the dawn of written history, when local rulers extended their realms by conquering other states. Ancient
imperialism reached its climax under the Roman Empire, but it was an important force elsewhere, e.g., the Middle East, N Africa, and central Asia. In the West,
imperialism was reborn with the emergence of the modern nation-state and the age of exploration and discovery. European colonization of the Western Hemisphere
and Africa from the 15th to 17th cent. was followed in the 18th century by attempts to regulate the trade of colonies in the interests of the mother country.
Later, the growth of manufacturing after the industrial revolution introduced a new form of imperialism, as industrial nations scrambled for raw materials and
new markets for manufactured products. The inequities of the system produced a growing opposition by the end of the 19th century when Marxists argued that
imperialism was the ultimate state of capitalism. After World War I, anti-imperialist feeling grew rapidly, and since World War II nearly all of the countries
once subject to Western control have achieved independence. Contemporary debate centers on neo-imperialism, with many less-developed countries contending that
their economic development is largely determined by the developed countries through unfair trading practices, control over capital, and the power of
multinational corporations.
What effect did it have on a country when it was taken over by another?
Why would it be advantageous/disadvantageous for a country to take over another?
What are the long-range implications of taking over?
NOTE: This debate over acquisition of the Philippines set the stage for all international relations after this. You should use this debate to focus your opinions about other country's international acquisitions.
The Senatorial Debate Over The Philippines
Overview: This debate will help you to understand the key issues facing the US around 1900 concerning Imperialism and specifically, the acquisition of the Philippines. This activity will also help you to determine a thesis and supporting points for an argument.
Introduction:
(Day 1)
We will discuss the situation following the Spanish American War and the task before the senate. You will then receive a packet of information about the arguments of each of the Senators. Each group will receive a specific Senator to review. (15 min)
Instructions:
1. Read your Senator’s piece and write down the Senator’s thesis and at least two supporting points. Remember that a thesis states the Senator’s position and the reason for that position. (15 min)
1.
2.
3.
4.
2. Select a member of the group to read the speech and a member to provide a summary of your interpretation of the Senator’s ideas tomorrow in class. (5 min)
Reader (name)___________________ Summary (name)_________________
4. If you have time.
Name __________________________________ For Against
Name__________________________________ For Against
Name __________________________________ For Against
Name__________________________________ For Against
Name __________________________________ For Against
Name__________________________________ For Against
Name __________________________________ For Against
Name__________________________________ For Against
Name __________________________________ For Against
Name__________________________________ For Against
(Day 2)
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
On the backside of this sheet please write your own argument for why the Senate should or should not make the Philippines into a colony. Be sure to include a thesis statement and three points with explanations of those points. Use complete sentences and underline your thesis. (30 min)
Thanks,
If you finish you may start on the reading assignment – Section 5, page 538 to 541.
If you still have time after that. Answer the questions in the Section 5 review.