Main | Assignments | Calendar | Student Work | Paperwork | Portfolio | Student Progress


 

The Senate Debate over the Philippines.

Sen. Caffey (con)
1. We must have the consent of the people to acquire the territory.
2. Any acquired territory must eventually become a state and the inhabitants must become citizens.
3. It is unwise to acquire the Philippines due to the fact that they are a distant (geographically) and dissimilar culture.

Sen. Hoar (con)
1. The US has no right to take the Philippines, the idea that we "must never take down the American flag where it has flown" is poppycock. 
2. The idea of taking these countries is simply becoming another European Tyrant.

Sen. Platt (pro)
1. The Indians have benefited from our civilization and acquisition of North America.
2.  It would be a crime for us not to offer our excellent governing to these people of the Philippines who cannot govern themselves.
3.  We have a moral duty to civilize the masses and spread democracy.

Sen. Mason (con)
Ok, So you say that these people are savages that we must support.  You think that they cannot govern themselves.  For years in this country we have burdened ourselves by stooping to hold down the black man.  We said, "I must protect you from the evils of the world by keeping a book out of your hand and providing you with food as my slave."  (sarcasm)  We just fought a @#$@%! war over this situation because we believed that the downtrodden could lift themselves up and transcend such racism and repression.  And here we are again claiming that we need to help these poor, downtrodden, people by removing their independence?  This war was for liberty, and it should end in the pursuit of this liberty.

Sen. Allen (con)  
You need the consent of congress to go to war with the Philippines.  The Navy and Army were at war with Spain.  Spain no longer controls the Philippines.

Sen. Foraker (pro)
It is constitutional to acquire this territory due to its necessity for the defense of the nation (military base).  This was the reason we constitutionally acquired Hawaii.

Sen. Hoar (con) 
Yet the Hawaiians had chosen to be annexed by a majority.  

Sen. Mc Laurin (con) 
For the same reason we gave slaves freedom and suffrage, we cannot justify imperialism.  Forming an imperialistic democracy is like forming an atheistic theology.

Sen. Bacon (con)
We gave weapons to savages and they helped us win.  We made a mistake in this manner, but we cannot force such a different people to adopt our government.  We would have to colonize this country and rule it with an iron hand.  The Philippines would be our weak spot and a black hole for our military to attempt to hold order.

Sen. Nelson (pro) 
Just like Mexico and upper California the Philippines will become an acquired territory.  We are saving them from Spanish tyranny just as we saved those territories.  

Sen. Chandler (con)
The only people that made money from Hawaii annexation were the local sugar growers.  Manifest Destiny is also a bunch of irrational thought.  The logical conclusion of this destiny is that we eventually conquer the world, and this is truly not a reality in US policy.

Sen. Lodge (pro)
We need to focus on the question as to whether the taking of the Philippines is constitutional.  The constitution is a document that we as Americans support and uphold.  To leave these Filipinos to the self proclaimed dictator is less constitutional than supporting the Philippines and upholding justice and democracy in that region.  I believe in the ability of the American people and government to do what is best and most just for the Filipinos.  
If we reject the treaty with the Philippines, then we are handing them back to Spain.  To back away from our responsibility as a new great power would only show that we are weak and incapable of handling such foreign affairs.  
Take the Philippines out of the hands of the war and Spain and give them to the United States Congress and peace.

Sen. Platt (pro)
Aguinaldo has arms that we have provided and is threatening to attack if we do not sign his treaty.  We need to sign this treaty to maintain peace.  This will not only support peace with Aguinaldo, but it will outlast his small band and a better government will surface.

Sen. Rawlins (con)
We do not need this territory.  We will then have to call ourselves the "Empire of America" or "The United States and the Kingdom of the Philippines."  This acquisition would not help our labor surplus and our governing of these people would not be beneficial to them.

Sen. Allen (pro)
We need to sign the treaty quickly, for any complications will result in European interference and complications.

 


  

 


To Contact Scott Bennett Please E-Mail : sbennet3@gonzaga.edu
All weekdays I am in School from 7:30 AM to around 4:00 PM unless otherwise noted.
Submit a comment...